What is Federalist Platform
How Federalist evolved and why it matters to digital experience leaders
Federalist began as an 18F project to cut the cost and time of launching public websites. It packaged static-site best practices into a simple service: write content in Git, auto-build on commit, and ship to a CDN with HTTPS and accessibility checks. That focus on speed, security, and accessibility informed today's cloud.gov Pages, the modern successor operated by GSA.
For a digital experience leader, the value is pragmatic:
- Reduced time-to-launch: Templates and continuous deployment remove build and release bottlenecks.
- Lower operational risk: Static delivery, automated scans, and inherited FedRAMP controls reduce attack surface and compliance work.
- Consistent quality: Section 508 support, USWDS-ready patterns, and version control improve accessibility and governance.
- Elastic reach: CDN distribution with autoscaling and DDoS protection handles traffic spikes without new infrastructure.
The upshot: teams publish fast, secure informational sites without maintaining servers, while keeping content, history, and approvals visible in Git-based workflows.
How it works: workflows, security, and performance in practice
The platform's operating model is straightforward and proven for static and data-backed static sites.
- Authoring and change control: Content lives in a GitHub repository. Teams use pull requests for edits and approvals, which creates a clear audit trail. Non-technical editors can use simple web-based editing.
- Build and deploy: On merge, the service builds the site and publishes it within seconds. No command line or FTP is required.
- Security and compliance: Sites run on a FedRAMP-authorized platform (cloud.gov). HTTPS is automatic, monthly vulnerability and accessibility scans run by default, and documentation support is available for Authority to Use processes via the Pages ATU guide.
- Performance and reliability: Content is served through a CDN with autoscaling and DDoS protection. Caching and edge delivery provide fast page loads.
- Accessibility and design: Section 508 and federal website standards are first-class concerns, with USWDS-friendly workflows and guidance.
- Support and operations: An in-house help desk, office hours, and documentation reduce handoffs and keep teams moving.
These mechanics are optimized for public-facing informational sites, prototypes, documentation, and resource hubs where reliability, accessibility, and speed matter more than server-side complexity.
When to use it, and how to evaluate alternatives
Use Federalist's model (now cloud.gov Pages) when you need:
- Rapid publishing without infrastructure: You prefer Git-based content governance and a managed build-and-host pipeline.
- Security and compliance guardrails: Inherited platform controls, HTTPS, CDN, and automated scans are table stakes.
- Accessibility by default: Section 508 alignment and USWDS patterns reduce retrofits and rework.
Consider alternatives if you require:
- Complex server-side logic or databases: Dynamic applications or custom backend services may point to a PaaS/IaaS or serverless stack.
- Vendor-specific CMS lock-in: If you need a proprietary WYSIWYG CMS, ensure it integrates cleanly with Git workflows or be ready to adapt processes.
Evaluation checklist:
- Content model fits static or static-plus-APIs.
- Teams are comfortable with Git-based reviews, or can adopt a simple editor tied to Git.
- Compliance needs align with inherited FedRAMP controls and the Pages ATU approach.
- Traffic profile benefits from CDN delivery and autoscaling.
Decision rule: if most content is read-heavy, public, and does not require custom backends, this platform minimizes time, cost, and risk while improving accessibility and performance.




%20Certified.png)